Russia’s Checkmate Light Tactical Fighter Is Officially Unveiled (Updated)

After a much-hyped buildup, Russia’s latest fighter jet design has arrived on the international stage.

byThomas Newdick|
Russia photo


The wraps have finally, officially, come off the mock-up of Russia’s new light fighter, the Sukhoi Checkmate, also known as the Light Tactical Aircraft, or LTS in Russian, with a formal unveiling at the opening of the MAKS international air show at Zhukovsky, outside Moscow, today. Observers who had been given a succession of tantalizing, and mainly unofficial, glimpses of the new jet over the last few days now have the chance to examine the aircraft from all aspects. The actual ceremony ended up being delayed by several hours, perhaps to accommodate the visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who was shown inspecting the mock-up after opening the show. 

The end result is very much in keeping with the observations that The War Zone has been gathering based on initial, leaked, imagery, much of it that came when the aircraft was still literally under wraps. The United Aircraft Corporation and Rostec, for their part, which are responsible for the Sukhoi design bureau, seemed to actively encourage this process, harnessing it as something of a PR coup.

The unveiling of the Sukhoi Checkmate, or LTS, earlier today. , ROSTEC

You can read our full assessment of the jet here, based on its first fleeting appearance “in the flesh,” as well as our analysis of the single-engine concept and the potential sales prospects of such an aircraft.

Video thumbnail

The aircraft's intake has been one of its most debated features over the last week. New imagery shows the angular ventral inlet, which wraps around the lower nose section, to share features with a diverterless supersonic inlet (DSI) design, but exactly how mature Russia's take on this concept is, remains to be seen. 

In terms of new developments, we now know that, as suspected, there is a larger main weapons bay within the lower fuselage. This is designed to accommodate three examples of the RVV-BD air-to-air missile, the export version of the very-long-range R-37M, or AA-13 Axehead, a weapon that you can read more about here. Furthermore, we now have confirmation that the long, conformal weapons bays located forward of the main landing gear are indeed intended to house smaller air-to-air missiles, for close-range defense.

Performance-wise, the manufacturer is apparently claiming a short takeoff and landing capability (rather than a full short takeoff and vertical landing capability, as in the F-35B), a range of up to 1,860 miles, combat radius of 930 miles, and a payload in excess of 15,000 pounds.  

The airframe is said to be stressed to 8g, which is only slightly less than the 9g at which the airframe of the Su-35S Flanker heavyweight fighter is rated. This may reflect the fact the design focuses more on low-observable characteristics and range than maneuverability, although the final result is likely closer to the Su-57, concentrating on reducing the signature from the frontal hemisphere, rather than all-aspect stealth.

This approach to low observability might also help drive down the price tag, although the figure of less than $30 million that has been presented seems to be wildly optimistic. By contrast, there was much fanfare when Lockheed Martin managed to bring the unit cost of its F-35A down to less than $80 million, achieved in 2019 after hundreds of examples had been built.

An official press release from Rostec provides few further details about the LTS but does claim that there is “artificial intelligence support for the pilot’s work,” although it’s not clear how this is manifested. Moreover, it seems unlikely that Russia is anywhere as far along as the various U.S. Air Force projects exploring developments in AI and autonomous flight, including “digital co-pilots.”

A glimpse into the Checkmate’s cockpit — also a mock-up, of course — reveals a single, large-area display dominating the control panel, plus a smaller display above it, together with a traditional central control stick and a conventional-looking head-up display.

The projected timeline for the LTS includes the first flight of a technology demonstrator in 2023, followed by construction of pre-series prototypes in 2024-25, and delivery of initial production examples potentially as early as 2026-27. All this, however, depends on first securing the funds to continue the project. With that in mind, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov was in a bullish mood at MAKS, claiming that the core markets would be India, Vietnam, and in Africa, and projecting global demand for 300 examples of the fighter.

Meanwhile, although it might be tempting to try and see where Sukhoi’s designers may have picked up inspiration for the new LTS, as Tyler Rogoway has pointed out, there are only so many ways to create an advanced fighter, with all the associated attributes, and compromises.

That said, the Russian design does make an interesting comparison to some previous fighter studies and concepts, both in Russia and the United States.

The tailerons, in particular, are a feature that has been seen on various different fighter concepts, including the U.S. Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) designs from the 1990s, and the Northrop YF-23, which was the unsuccessful rival to the F-22 Raptor. However, they also seem to be combined with stub-like horizontal tail surfaces on either side of the engine exhaust, used for pitch control. 

There are also a number of other U.S. studies that pre-date the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program that have some interesting parallels with the Sukhoi LTS design. In particular, there is the Northrop MRF-54E, a precursor to the YF-23 that allied an angular “chin” intake with tailerons.

Not to be left out, Mikoyan, Sukhoi’s traditional rival in the fighter-designing business, has also unveiled some future combat aircraft concepts at MAKS, including a light multirole fighter, an advanced carrier-based fighter, and a stealthy carrier-based refueling drone, comparable to the MQ-25 Stingray. In contrast to the Sukhoi LTS, these would appear to be pitched mainly toward domestic, rather than export requirements, where the market prospects are likely less favorable. Nevertheless, they provide an interesting insight into the kinds of concepts Mikoyan is looking at for potential future development.

The carrier-based fighter, in particular, shows a strong lineage to the Mikoyan design for the Multi-functional Frontline Fighter, or Mnogofunksionalni Frontovoy Istrebitel, abbreviated MFI, which led to the prototype 1.44 that was first flown, after much delay, in 2000. Unlike the Sukhoi LTS, this new Mikoyan fighter proposal retains the twin-engine powerplant favored by the Russian military since the end of the Cold War.

The prototype Mikoyan 1.44 heavyweight fighter., Vitaly V. Kuzmin/Wikimedia Commons

It seems that, as expected, the Sukhoi fighter design will be the major talking point of the MAKS air show this year. The LTS design offers some intriguing solutions to the various problems of designing a new-generation fighter. On the other hand, it will need serious support from Russia and/or a wealthy export customer in order to make the next step, and progress to an airworthy demonstrator, especially with a projected first flight set for 2023. Thereafter, commercial success will be a challenge, too, especially with no shortage of potential rivals from China, South Korea, Turkey, and elsewhere waiting in the wings.

Update, July 20, 11:30 AM PST: Further details of the planned configuration of the Sukhoi Checkmate LTS are emerging, as observers make their way through the various pronouncements made by officials during the unveiling earlier today.

On Twitter, Moscow-based @krakek1, in particular, has been parsing some of the key announcements about the new fighter design. 

Here’s a summary of what a production version of the LTS is supposed to offer:

The planned powerplant is not confirmed, but it is described as an engine in the 14.5 to 16-ton thrust class engine, utilizing off-the-shelf components. This rating would put it at the upper end of the output of the AL-41F1 turbofan now used in the Su-57, or at the lower end of the all-new Izdeliye 30, which is currently still in development.

Whatever the engine choice, Russia is promising a fighter with high-end performance, including the aforementioned STOL attributes, although it is noteworthy, perhaps, that the ability to supercruise has not been mentioned so far.

In addition to the three long-range and two short-range AAMs that can be carried in the internal bays, a wide variety of air-to-ground ordnance is being offered as well. Unusually for a fifth-generation design, as well as different precision-guided munitions, the unveiling showed that the jet will also be able to carry various unguided rockets and dumb bombs. There will also be provision for an internal cannon, likely a 30mm weapon as on the Su-57.


The active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, of undisclosed type, is intended to engage six targets simultaneously while operating in a hostile electronic countermeasures environment. The radar will be part of one of an all-round sensor suite, including passive devices, likely similar to those found on the Su-57.

In fact, the leveraging of Su-57 technologies seems to be one of the cornerstones of Checkmate. Not only does it promise to reduce development costs, but it should, when combined with an open-architecture approach, let customers pick and choose which sensors, for example, they need on their particular LTS iteration.

Looking further ahead, there is talk of operating Checkmate as part of a manned/unmanned team, and even an unmanned version of the jet, as well as further development of a potential (manned) naval variant, most likely directed at the requirements of the Russian Navy

Overall, Rostec is confident that its offering will attract customers thanks to its low operating costs, and also points to its logistics chain and post-sale support. In the past, these last two factors, in particular, have been bugbears for operators of Soviet and Russian aircraft, so it will be intriguing to see how they are addressed. On top of that, the LTS should offer ease of maintenance and operations, including when support infrastructure is limited. While that is not new for Russian designs, it would be a break from most fifth-generation design philosophies.

As of today, the program is being funded internally, with investors being sought to launch production for export. Interestingly, officials said they hoped that Russia might opt for the unmanned variant, rather than the manned fighter.

Contact the author: